The energy created by the force of water can provide a more sustainable, non-polluting alternative to fossil fuels, with other renewable energy sources including wind, solar, tidal, geothermal, and bioenergy. Micro hydropower, which is hydro energy on a ‘small’ scale, provides hydro-mechanical and hydroelectricity to small communities. The purpose of this study is to conduct technical assessments of the micro-hydropower potential of generating hydroelectric and hydro mechanical power from existing irrigation schemes in Southwestern Oromia. From three zones, 14 schemes from Jimma Zone, 14 schemes from Buno Bedele Zone, and 3 schemes from Ilubabor Zone were selected; all of these schemes had the potential for irrigation and were functional, out of 13 woreda, 31 irrigation schemes were assessed. Among the analyzed schemes, the maximum Hydraulic power potential for micro-hydropower generation at 80% efficiency was 5.14kW at the Gura scheme in the Gechi woreda in the Buno Bedele zone. The maximum discharge and head recorded were 1.027m3/s and 1.4m at the Gura scheme in the Gechi woreda in the Bedele zone, and the Hursa scheme in the Gomma woreda in the Jimma zone. Some of the assessed schemes are not sufficient for micro-hydro power generation, except the Gura scheme in the Gechi woreda in the Buno Bedele zone. However, some of them are possible with technical advances for Pico-hydropower.
Published in | International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering (Volume 14, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijepe.20251403.12 |
Page(s) | 86-95 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Assessment, Discharge, Head, Irrigation, Micro-hydropower, Schemes
Zone | Woreda | Irrigation Schemes | Distance from the residential area (m) | No of household (pcs) | Head (m) | Flow rate (m3/s) | Hydraulic power generation (Kw) | Hydraulic power generation (Kw) (at 80% efficiency) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jimma | Omo Nada | Toli colle | 250 | 100 | 0.033 | 0.137 | 0.04435 | 0.035 |
Jimma | Omo Nada | Seno | 112 | 150 | 0.79 | 0.022 | 0.17049 | 0.126 |
Jimma | Omo Nada | Nada kala | 700 | 200 | 0.001 | 0.0385 | 0.000377 | 0.0003 |
Jimma | Omo Nada | Boneya | 150 | 6 | 0.207 | 0.0638 | 0.1295 | 0.1 |
Jimma | Dedo | Offole | 100 | 50 | 0.296 | 0.0431 | 0.125 | 0.1 |
Jimma | Dedo | Korjo | 100 | 30 | 0.298 | 0.0125 | 0.0365 | 0.028 |
Jimma | Dedo | Waro | 55 | 50 | 0.032 | 0.112 | 0.035 | 0.028 |
Jimma | Gera | Gicho | 100 | 200 | 0.47 | 0.0395 | 0.182 | 0.146 |
Jimma | Gomma | Hida | 221 | 101 | 0.94 | 0.1165 | 1.074 | 0.86 |
Jimma | Gomma | Tamsa | 50 | 100 | 0.037 | 0.028 | 0.01 | 0.008 |
Jimma | Gomma | Hursa | 100 | 150 | 1.42 | 0.2 | 2.78 | 2.22 |
Jimma | S/chokersa | G/kachama | 70 | 2 | 0.175 | 0.1828 | 0.3138 | 0.24 |
Jimma | L/sakka | Hursa | 5 | 20 | 0.622 | 0.01279 | 0.078 | 0.062 |
Jimma | L/sakka | M/Shomboqo | 50 | 33 | 0.22 | 0.0191 | 0.041 | 0.032 |
B/ Bedele | chora | Kodo | 300 | 40 | 0.96 | 0.0359 | 0.338 | 0.27 |
B/ Bedele | chora | Nacho | 400 | 20 | 0.03 | 0.0167 | 0.0049 | 0.0039 |
B/Bedele | chora | Debaso 2nd | 500 | 130 | 0.09 | 0.0148 | 0.013 | 0.01 |
B/Bedele | chora | Xiphacha | 600 | 200 | 0.03 | 0.0038 | 0.0011 | 0.0008 |
B/ Bedele | chora | Sota | 100 | 10 | 0.02 | 0.0165 | 0.00323 | 0.0025 |
B/Bedele | Bedele | Hursa | 20 | 50 | 0.785 | 0.0162 | 0.124 | 0.099 |
B/Bedele | Bedele | Urgesa | 300 | 50 | 0.02 | 0.0532 | 0.001 | 0.0008 |
B/Bedele | Gechi | Gura | 112 | 55 | 0.65 | 1.0272 | 6.376 | 5.14 |
B/Bedele | Gechi | Kobba Kala | 85 | 52 | 0.315 | 0.0242 | 0.07478 | 0.059 |
B/Bedele | Gechi | Kobba guda | 119 | 80 | 0.51 | 0.156 | 0.78 | 0.624 |
B/Bedele | Gechi | H/konbolcha | 15 | 70 | 0.95 | 0.164 | 1.528 | 1.22 |
B/Bedele | Gechi | Doriye | 200 | 52 | 0.1 | 0.049 | 0.048 | 0.038 |
B/Bedele | Dedesa | Gela | 70 | 80 | 0.45 | 0.0653 | 0.239 | 0.19 |
B/Bedele | Dedesa | Gepha | 80 | 56 | 0.34 | 0.0362 | 0.12 | 0.096 |
Illubabor | Yayu | Qanqe | 50 | 50 | 0.46 | 0.0087 | 0.03925 | 0.03 |
Illubabor | Hurumu | Wanxe | 100 | 60 | 0.59 | 0.027 | 0.156 | 0.12 |
Illubabor | Ale | A/qonnor | 500 | 180 | 0.84 | 0.0135 | 0.111 | 0.088 |
MHP | Micro-hydro Power |
kW | Kilo Watt |
GPS | Geographical Positioning System |
Q | Flow Rate |
V | Flow Velocity |
A | Cross-sectional Area |
H | Head |
b | Width |
y | Depth of Water |
S | Distance |
t | Time |
[1] | O. John, O. J. Mdee, C. Z. Kimambo, T. K. Nielsen, and J. Kihedu, “Measurement methods for hydropower resources: a review,” Water Utility Journal, vol. 18, pp. 21–38, 2018. |
[2] | X. He, 2021) a Khan, SamihIn comparison to other renewable energy sources, it is among the most developed technologies for converting natural water energy to electrical energy (Abolhosseini et al., I. Ozturk, and M. Murshed, “The role of renewable energy investment in tackling climate change concerns: Environmental policies for achieving SDG‐13,” Sustainable Development, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1888-1901, 2023. |
[3] | D. Gibb et al., “Renewables 2022 global status report+ Renewable energy data in perspective+ Press releases+ Regional fact sheets+ Country fact sheets,” 2022. |
[4] | WSHPDR, “World Small Hydropower Development Report, 2022,” South African Medical Journal, vol. 101, no. 2003, p. 16, 2022, |
[5] | A. Zukhrufiyati, J. Triyono, S. Ginting, and E. W. Irianto, “Determination of Dependable Flow for Microhydro Power Plant in Irrigation Network,” no. September, pp. 1-7, 2019. |
[6] | A. Williams and S. Porter, “Comparison of hydropower options for developing countries with regard to the environmental, social and economic aspects,” Small, vol. 1, p. 10MW, 2006. |
[7] | D. Singh, “Micro Hydro Power Resource Assessment Handbook,” no. September, p. 69, 2009. |
[8] | Z. M. Yaseen et al., “State-of-the art-powerhouse, dam structure, and turbine operation and vibrations,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 1676, 2020. |
[9] | M. C. Chacón, J. A. R. Díaz, J. G. Morillo, and A. McNabola, “Evaluation of the design and performance of a micro hydropower plant in a pressurised irrigation network: Real world application at farm-level in Southern Spain,” Renewable Energy, vol. 169, pp. 1106–1120, 2021. |
[10] | A. Mohammadi, S. Rafiee, A. Jafari, A. Keyhani, S. H. Mousavi-Avval, and S. Nonhebel, “Energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of farming systems in north Iran,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 30, pp. 724–733, 2014. |
[11] | A. Wood and A. Dixon, “Ethiopian Wetlands Research Programme Sustainable Wetland Management in Illubabor Zone Sustainable Wetland Management in Illubabor Zone,” 2000. |
[12] | T. Saroinsong, M. S. Polytechnic, R. Soenoko, and S. Wahyudi, “Performance of three-bladed Archimedes screw turbine PERFORMANCE OF THREE-BLADED ARCHIMEDES SCREW TURBINE,” no. January, 2016. |
[13] | Z. Zhang et al., “Calibration method and experiment based on I/Q demodulation principle,” He Jishu/Nuclear Techniques, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1-13, 2015, |
[14] | A. Tamrakar, S. K. Pandey, S. C. Dubey, R. E. College, R. E. College, and I. Introduction, “Hydro Power Opportunity in the Sewage Waste Water,” pp. 179-183, 2015. |
[15] | A. YoosefDoost and W. D. Lubitz, “Archimedes screw turbines: A sustainable development solution for green and renewable energy generation-a review of potential and design procedures,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 18, 2020, |
[16] | Getenet, “Assessment of Hydropower Potential of Selected Rivers in North Shoa Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia,” American Journal of Energy Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 15–18, 2019, |
APA Style
Tibesso, A., Aliyi, A., Docha, Y. (2025). Technical Assessment of Existing Irrigation Schemes for Micro-hydro Power Generation Potential in Jimma, Buno Bedelle, and Ilubabor Zones, South-Western Oromia. International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 14(3), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20251403.12
ACS Style
Tibesso, A.; Aliyi, A.; Docha, Y. Technical Assessment of Existing Irrigation Schemes for Micro-hydro Power Generation Potential in Jimma, Buno Bedelle, and Ilubabor Zones, South-Western Oromia. Int. J. Energy Power Eng. 2025, 14(3), 86-95. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepe.20251403.12
AMA Style
Tibesso A, Aliyi A, Docha Y. Technical Assessment of Existing Irrigation Schemes for Micro-hydro Power Generation Potential in Jimma, Buno Bedelle, and Ilubabor Zones, South-Western Oromia. Int J Energy Power Eng. 2025;14(3):86-95. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepe.20251403.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijepe.20251403.12, author = {Adem Tibesso and Abduselam Aliyi and Yahikob Docha}, title = {Technical Assessment of Existing Irrigation Schemes for Micro-hydro Power Generation Potential in Jimma, Buno Bedelle, and Ilubabor Zones, South-Western Oromia }, journal = {International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering}, volume = {14}, number = {3}, pages = {86-95}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijepe.20251403.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20251403.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepe.20251403.12}, abstract = {The energy created by the force of water can provide a more sustainable, non-polluting alternative to fossil fuels, with other renewable energy sources including wind, solar, tidal, geothermal, and bioenergy. Micro hydropower, which is hydro energy on a ‘small’ scale, provides hydro-mechanical and hydroelectricity to small communities. The purpose of this study is to conduct technical assessments of the micro-hydropower potential of generating hydroelectric and hydro mechanical power from existing irrigation schemes in Southwestern Oromia. From three zones, 14 schemes from Jimma Zone, 14 schemes from Buno Bedele Zone, and 3 schemes from Ilubabor Zone were selected; all of these schemes had the potential for irrigation and were functional, out of 13 woreda, 31 irrigation schemes were assessed. Among the analyzed schemes, the maximum Hydraulic power potential for micro-hydropower generation at 80% efficiency was 5.14kW at the Gura scheme in the Gechi woreda in the Buno Bedele zone. The maximum discharge and head recorded were 1.027m3/s and 1.4m at the Gura scheme in the Gechi woreda in the Bedele zone, and the Hursa scheme in the Gomma woreda in the Jimma zone. Some of the assessed schemes are not sufficient for micro-hydro power generation, except the Gura scheme in the Gechi woreda in the Buno Bedele zone. However, some of them are possible with technical advances for Pico-hydropower. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Technical Assessment of Existing Irrigation Schemes for Micro-hydro Power Generation Potential in Jimma, Buno Bedelle, and Ilubabor Zones, South-Western Oromia AU - Adem Tibesso AU - Abduselam Aliyi AU - Yahikob Docha Y1 - 2025/08/30 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20251403.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijepe.20251403.12 T2 - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering JF - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering JO - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering SP - 86 EP - 95 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-960X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20251403.12 AB - The energy created by the force of water can provide a more sustainable, non-polluting alternative to fossil fuels, with other renewable energy sources including wind, solar, tidal, geothermal, and bioenergy. Micro hydropower, which is hydro energy on a ‘small’ scale, provides hydro-mechanical and hydroelectricity to small communities. The purpose of this study is to conduct technical assessments of the micro-hydropower potential of generating hydroelectric and hydro mechanical power from existing irrigation schemes in Southwestern Oromia. From three zones, 14 schemes from Jimma Zone, 14 schemes from Buno Bedele Zone, and 3 schemes from Ilubabor Zone were selected; all of these schemes had the potential for irrigation and were functional, out of 13 woreda, 31 irrigation schemes were assessed. Among the analyzed schemes, the maximum Hydraulic power potential for micro-hydropower generation at 80% efficiency was 5.14kW at the Gura scheme in the Gechi woreda in the Buno Bedele zone. The maximum discharge and head recorded were 1.027m3/s and 1.4m at the Gura scheme in the Gechi woreda in the Bedele zone, and the Hursa scheme in the Gomma woreda in the Jimma zone. Some of the assessed schemes are not sufficient for micro-hydro power generation, except the Gura scheme in the Gechi woreda in the Buno Bedele zone. However, some of them are possible with technical advances for Pico-hydropower. VL - 14 IS - 3 ER -